OLED vs OLED

Alienware AW2726DM vs ASUS XG27AQWMG: the cheapest OLED or the brighter one?

The AW2726DM is the cheapest way into QD-OLED but is dim; the XG27AQWMG costs more and measures far brighter on a glossy tandem WOLED panel.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. How affiliate links work here.

Pick for the least money

Alienware AW2726DM

Choose the Alienware for OLED contrast at the lowest cost in a dim room.

Check price on Amazon

Pick for brightness

ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG

Choose the ASUS if you want a much brighter picture and a USB hub.

Check price on Amazon

Brightness is the difference

Tom's Hardware measured the AW2726DM at about 200 nits in SDR and about 400 nits in HDR. It measured the XG27AQWMG at 557 nits SDR and 653 nits HDR, both at a 25% window. Even allowing for different test conditions, the ASUS is much brighter, which matters in anything but a dim room.

Panels and coatings

The Alienware is a 240Hz QD-OLED without an sRGB mode, so desktop colors look oversaturated. The ASUS is a 280Hz 4th-gen tandem WOLED with a glossy TrueBlack coating that reflects lamps and windows but looks very clear in controlled light.

Ports

The Alienware has DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC and two HDMI 2.1 ports (VRR up to 120Hz) and no USB at all. The ASUS adds a small USB hub. Neither has USB-C.

Warranty

Tom's Hardware reports a 3-year warranty including burn-in for the Alienware. The ASUS has a 3-year warranty, and ASUS's US policy covers panel burn-in on newer OLED models.

Verdict

On a tight budget in a dim room, the Alienware delivers the OLED look. If you can stretch, the ASUS is the more satisfying monitor.

Side-by-side

Attribute
OLEDAlienware AW2726DM

A 27-inch 1440p 240Hz QD-OLED priced like a mid-range LCD: most of the OLED experience for far less, minus brightness and extras.

Check price on Amazon
OLEDASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG

A 27-inch 1440p 280Hz tandem WOLED with a glossy TrueBlack coating that brings much of the flagship picture to a lower price.

Check price on Amazon
At a glance
Choose this if…
Choose this if…You want OLED contrast and speed for the least money.You want a bright, glossy OLED picture and do not need 480Hz+.
Panel and motion
Panel family
Panel familyOLEDOLED
Panel subtype
Panel subtypeQD-OLEDWOLED (4th gen tandem)
Motion technology
Motion technologyNoneUnknown
Backlight
BacklightNot applicable (OLED)Not applicable (OLED)
Coating
CoatingUnknownTrueBlack glossy
Subpixel layout
Subpixel layoutTriangular RGB (QD-OLED)Unknown (4th-gen WOLED)
Size and speed
Size
Size27″ (16:9)26.5″ (16:9)
Resolution
Resolution2560×14402560×1440
Refresh rate
Refresh rate240Hz280Hz
Dual mode
Dual modeNoNo
Adaptive sync / VRR
Adaptive sync / VRRAdaptive-Sync; AMD FreeSync PremiumG-SYNC Compatible; FreeSync Premium
Image and HDR
HDR (manufacturer)
HDR (manufacturer)HDR modes; about 400 nits peak measuredVESA DisplayHDR True Black 500 (per listing)
Independent measurements (not normalized)
Independent measurements (not normalized)
  • SDR brightness: About 200 nits (Maximum SDR; Tom's Hardware, April 14, 2026)
  • SDR brightness, calibrated: 185 nits (After calibration; Tom's Hardware, April 14, 2026)
  • HDR peak: About 400 nits (HDR mode peak; Tom's Hardware, April 14, 2026)
  • SDR brightness: 557 nits (25% window; Tom's Hardware, January 22, 2026)
  • HDR brightness: 653 nits (25% window; Tom's Hardware, January 22, 2026)
Connectivity
DisplayPort
DisplayPort1x DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC (needed for 240Hz)1x DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC
HDMI
HDMI2x HDMI 2.1 (VRR up to 120Hz)2x HDMI 2.1
USB-C
USB-CNoneNone
KVM
KVMNoNo
Console notes
Console notesHDMI 2.1 with VRR up to 120Hz; consoles output up to 1440p 120Hz here.HDMI 2.1; consoles run at up to 1440p 120Hz.
Ownership
Warranty
Warranty3 years including burn-in3 years including burn-in (US)
Burn-in coverage
Burn-in coverageCoveredCovered
Stand
StandHeight-adjustable standAdjustable ROG stand

Scroll sideways to see every monitor. Measurements come from different outlets and methods, so compare them only within the same source.

Add another monitor to this comparison